Impact of Fees

How Small Percentages Can Have a Large Effect Over Time

Investment fees are often described as "small," especially when viewed in isolation. But inside most portfolios, multiple layers of fees can exist at the same time, quietly reducing long-term results. The challenge isn't just the size of any one fee—it's how they add up and compound over time.

How Fees Show Up Inside A Portfolio

Many investors assume they're paying a single fee. In reality, fees often come from three separate places.

1. ADVISOR or WRAP FEES

(Fees paid to the advisor or advisory firm)

These fees typically cover:

  • ongoing advice,

  • portfolio oversight,

  • planning and service.

They are usually stated clearly and billed as a percentage of assets.

On their own, these fees may seem reasonable—but they are often only the first layer.

2. THIRD-PARTY MANAGEMENT FEES

(Fees paid to outside money managers)

In many portfolios, the advisor hires a third-party firm to:

  • design the investment strategy,

  • select securities,

  • manage day-to-day portfolio decisions.

These firms charge their own management fees, which are in addition to the advisor or wrap fee. Because these fees are embedded, many investors are unaware they're paying them.

3. Fund Expense Ratios

(Fees inside mutual funds or ETFs)

The investments themselves often carry internal costs:

  • fund management expenses,

  • operating costs,

  • trading and administrative fees.

These expense ratios are deducted directly from fund performance, which means investors never see a bill—but still pay the fee.

When multiple funds are used, these costs stack quietly in the background.

Why Fees Matter More Than They Appear

Fees reduce returns every year, regardless of market conditions.

Even modest differences can:

  • lower long-term account balances,

  • reduce income potential,

  • increase the return required just to break even.

Unlike market risk, fees are permanent and predictable—they compound against you year after year.

Our Approach

We believe fees should be:

  • transparent,

  • intentional,

  • and clearly tied to value.

Our focus is on minimizing unnecessary layers, simplifying portfolio structures, and ensuring that every cost has a clear purpose. Lower total fees don't guarantee better outcomes—but they do increase the probability that more of your portfolio's growth stays with you.

What This Means For You

Understanding how fees work together allows you to evaluate whether your portfolio is designed efficiently—or whether hidden layers may be working against your plan.


A Simple Mathematical Example of Stacked Fees

Assume the following:

Starting Balance: $500,000

Time Horizon: 30 years

Gross Annual Return: 8%

Now assume 3 layers of fees inside the portfolio:

Advisor/Wrap Fee: 1.00%

Third-Party Management Fee: 0.40%

Fund Expense Ratios: 0.39%

Total Annual Fees: 1.79%.

That reduces the net return from 8% to 6.21%.

What Happens Over 30 Years

At 8% with no fees:

The portfolio grows to ~$5.03 million.

At 6.21% after stacked fees:

The portfolio grows to ~$3.05 million.


The Difference

Total impact of stacked fees: ~$1.98 million.

That's money that could have stayed invested, compounded for decades, or supported future income needs.

The Key Insight

Fees don't just reduce returns in a single year — they reduce the base on which all future growth compounds.

Even when markets perform well, stacked fees can significantly alter long-term outcomes.


This example isn't about eliminating advice or expertise. It's about understanding how multiple layers of cost can quietly change results over time.

For educational purposes only.

Previous
Previous

Impact of Volatility